Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James R. Carey's avatar

Abraham Lincoln said, “Let us have faith that right makes might; and in that faith, let us dare to do our duty as we understand it.” Message received.

We are habitually behaving as if right makes might — as if the intrinsic value of every human is equal to the intrinsic value of every other human — by exception, or, by default, we are habitually behaving as if might makes right. To paraphrase Aristotle (384-322 BC), we are what we repeatedly do. Morality, then, is not an act, but a good habit. And if one does not form the good habit through deliberate practice, then by default, one is forming the bad “immorality” habit.

Our “moral” traditions — science, democracy, justice, journalism, capitalism, the world’s (large and small) religions, etc. — are civilization’s structural components. The weaker they are, the greater the risk to civilization’s health and survival.

The justice system failed in this “conversion therapy” judgement because only one of nine Supreme Court Justices has done an adequate job of deliberately practicing morality. And that is terrible, but I identify as a member of the scientific community, not the justice system, so I have a more immediate concern.

My “E15” essay describes seven famous stories of entire scientific communities behaving as if the purpose of science is not to get to the truth and is instead to get “our” way. For the record, seven famous stories are just the tip of the “famous story” iceberg, and the famous stories are the tip of a much larger iceberg.

I’m suggesting that we, the scientific community, get our act together first. Otherwise, how can we even claim to know how to have a positive impact on the other moral traditions?

My essay: https://jamesrcarey.substack.com/p/why-scientists-are-expert-problem?r=2nayrh.

Jeremiah Duboff's avatar

If Fags, Spics, Niggers, Kikes, Chinks, or Cunts don't want to tolerate certain words, then Fuck them.

No posts

Ready for more?